What happens to a lightsaber in water?
The subject of my post is a very important question that has been driving me nuts for the last three days, and my trusty Star Wars geek friend doesn't know, so I turn to LiveJournal. I'm scared to try a Google search, but I will if ya'll fail me.
Also, "ya'll" is totally the right way to punctuate it, not this "y'all" BS.
How do you people with, like, 200 people on your flist keep up? Jesus. I have 40 and just caught up last night, excluding the bajillion fics I bookmarked. Of course, all the Yuletide recs/links/enormous fucking archive is boosting the size of that list somewhat, but *still*.
ETA: Wow, L. Frank Baum really sucks at continuity. And this post is made of random.
Also, "ya'll" is totally the right way to punctuate it, not this "y'all" BS.
How do you people with, like, 200 people on your flist keep up? Jesus. I have 40 and just caught up last night, excluding the bajillion fics I bookmarked. Of course, all the Yuletide recs/links/enormous fucking archive is boosting the size of that list somewhat, but *still*.
ETA: Wow, L. Frank Baum really sucks at continuity. And this post is made of random.

no subject
The Wikipedia entry says the following (God know where they pulled this from, though):
When the activator is pushed, internal power cells create photoelectric energy and the blade is focused from the crystal, though a metallic channel that instantly creates a polar arc of proton-saturated ions. A tight beam of anti-protonic ions appears on command, which is focused through one, two, or three multi-faceted crystals and super heats any gas or liquid into recognizable plasma emissions. The activation button energizes the weapon forming a positively charged shaft of coherent packets of anti-proton energy arching back about a meter (3 ft) long. The anti-protonic ions are attracted back to the saber hilt by a negatively charged, high-energy flux aperture.
So it appears that a) it would superheat a liquid and b) is positively charged, but wouldn't conduct its charge in water because of the way the energy is cycled through the blade? And then you'd still get the effect with energy weapons. I think. I can't remember much physics right now.
I totally did use a dictionary. Y'all is becoming a very common word, and Shakespeare should tell you all about the legitimization of slang/made up words. And no, the contraction of "ya" and "all" does not form "y'all"--not according to the dictionary link I already provided, and not according to the basic rules of English. While the phrase "ya all" might be just as valid a slang form of "you all" as "y'all," it is an entirely different branching-off of the original phrase. The As are completely wrong; "ya" has an "a" that's pronounced "uh," like in "about." "All" has "a" pronounced "aw" like in "awl" or "saw." In "y'all," the "a" is pronounced in the latter fashion, as an "aw". Therefore, the "a" in "y'all" derives from the "a" in "all," not the "a" in "ya." So the contraction should be correctly written with the apostrophe after the "y," taking the place of the "ou" in "you all" and not the second "a" in "ya all," since the "a" in "all" is the one that should be kept. *dust off hands, looks smug*
God bless Project Gutenberg. I'm really looking forward to this fic, in case you couldn't tell, since I've been wanting you to write it for years (*eyes email from October 9, 2005*). I think it's a great idea, and I feel very teased by that little bit I was able to read. *pouts*
no subject
no subject
Ya'll is still more symmetrical, bitch. I'm sticking to my ungrammatically correct slang, and you can suck me.
no subject
My grammatically correct slang can kick your symmetrical slang's ass.
no subject
My slang will send your slang crying back to its dictionary, trying to hold its pronunciation together.
no subject
My slang is your slang what Bailey is to Sheppard--all mine has to do is stare yours down until it cracks down its weak little symmetrical backbone.
no subject
no subject
(dammit! I don't have any GA icons! CURSES)